“No one needs a gun at a library.” Well, until yesterday
(Dec. 2), no one in San Bernardino thought that they would need a gun at the
Health Department Christmas party. Evil can strike anytime, anywhere, for any
cause. We can’t delve into the California issues here, but we can discuss ‘gun-free
zones’ in Nevada and potential similar circumstances.
The Las Vegas-Clark County Library District have insisted that
the library is a special place that should be allowed to prohibit firearms.
Their legal justification is dubious and their logic that ideas need protected
from intimidation holds no water. A library holds no special, intrinsic value
that serves as a deterrent to violence. Churches, the most sacred of spaces,
don’t even have that benefit.
The vast majority of government facilities where large
numbers of people, especially the general public, congregate do not have armed
security. Armed security is also generally inadequate and the guards are not
intended to lay down their lives to end or spoil a terrorist attack. The armed
private security guards have guns for their protection, not for the public’s
benefit. The intention is that a guards can defend themselves, if someone they’ve
confronted becomes a threat to life. A $15/hr employee is not going to be
expected to try and intervene in a terrorist attack.
Citizens do not deserve to be unarmed sitting ducks. State
law and both the Nevada and federal constitutions guarantee the right to armed
self-protection. This is not to say that the attack yesterday could have been
thwarted by a citizen carrier. Perhaps knowing several armed people would be
present may have dissuaded the
attackers or saved a life or two.
The only way to stop a bad guy with a gun is a good guy with
a gun.
Excepts from Allied Barton's armed security policy from a Open Records Act request.
No comments:
Post a Comment