SB 115, Senator Moises Denis (D) and Assemblywoman Shannon Bilbray-Axelrod (D)
This bill would amend NRS 202.265 to prohibit firearms (openly or concealed) at public libraries, except with written permission of the Board of Trustees, even in the parking lot.
X Oppose
This bill is revenge for open carriers defying the totally illegal firearms ban for Las Vegas area libraries, of which Assemblywoman Bilbray-Axelrod was a trustee.
SB
115 proposes to ban legally carried firearms even in the parking lots of
libraries. The bill seeks to add libraries to the law prohibiting firearms at
schools and daycares because citizens dared exercise their Second Amendment
rights in defiance of the notoriously anti-gun Las Vegas-Clark County Library
District (LVCCLD). In the whole state, only
LVCCLD enforces such a policy and has repeatedly
broken state law, which prohibits
local authorities from regulating firearms.
Ironically, one politician, soon to be termed-out Shannon
Bilbray-Axelrod, now an assemblywoman, followed up on her
promise to introduce an anti-open carry bill in the Legislature. Shannon
Bilbray-Axelrod was present during the November
2015 LVCCLD board meeting where several citizens and then Assemblywoman
Shelton, spoke against the library district’s illegal actions.
LVCCLD prohibits firearms, contrary to state law which explicitly
prevents local authorities from enforcing such policies. In fact, the library
district policy was created administratively without legal authority. These
actions were in total defiance of not just the state preemption of local
firearm regulation laws, but the very law that the library district was
claiming as its authority to enforce its anti-open carry policy. The Board of
Trustees, who are required to vote and approve any such policies, never voted
on the policy in question.
Pursuant to state law, concealed carry is prohibited in
public (government) buildings where “no guns” signs or metal detectors are present
at each public entrance. Open
carry is legal in virtually every non-school public building, a fact
confirmed in an opinion from the Legislative Counsel Bureau in 2015. Only the Legislature
may prohibit firearms in certain places.
The library administration made their own policy; this power
belongs exclusively to the Board of Trustees. Previously, the Board of Trustees’
approved Code
of Conduct (pre-July 2016) only prohibited concealed firearms, affirming
state law. Subsequently, the Code of Conduct was wholly re-written
in July of 2016 to prohibit: “Possession of weapons or dangerous items of
any kind.” This re-write explicitly violates the provisions of state preemption
laws.
The Board of Trustees, library administrators, and Clark
County Commissioners and city councilmen have no authority to prohibit guns in
any government building. These facts have been made public to a candid world
and ignored by appointed officials, elected officials, and judges.
There have been no incidents of crime, violence, or threats
to safety because of openly carried firearms in libraries. The only issues (in
fact as a whole nationwide, as it seems) were caused by overzealous anti-gun
library officials. LVCCLD went so far as to have a
mother arrested and trespassed from the library enforcing its illegal
policy, though charges were dropped.
In response to scathing criticism, state law, and a lawsuit,
Bilbray-Axelrod and Denis have introduced this bill with no factual need
whatsoever. There is no threat to public safety; there has never been. This is
an anti-gun bill, plain and simple, and over-reaction to hurt feelings and citizens
who dared standup to petty tyrants in local government. This bill is nothing
more than a personal fuck you to open
carriers, gun owners, and those that believe in public accountability by
government officials.
This bill must be opposed. If signed into law, it would
prohibit firearms even in the parking lots of libraries, meaning one would
couldn’t even park on library property if they cared for their own
self-defense. Open carry is
a constitutionally protected right, hinted at in Peruta v. Gore, a decision that currently applies to Nevada, and in
countless historical decisions by other state’s courts. In fact, firearms were
not prohibited at all in any public building until the 1990s.
There is no
problem except with intransigent liberal petty tyrants. If this becomes law,
state preemption could be further eroded by any local government or future
legislators that hate gun rights. In California, after campus carry was banned, state legislators are this year attempting to take away local school district's authority to grant permission to carry concealed firearms simply because school districts are doing it. Don't help make Nevada California.
You can send your comments on the bill to the Legislature by
clicking here.
Be sure to enter “SB115” and select the "Against" button. Catalog of
library-open carry topics here.
Senate Judiciary Committee
Tick Segerblom, Chair
Nicole Cannizzaro, Vice Chair
For your convenience, you can copy/paste the following into your email message:
tsegerblom@sen.state.nv.us; Michael.Roberson@sen.state.nv.us; Moises.Denis@sen.state.nv.us; Don.Gustavson@sen.state.nv.us; Becky.Harris@sen.state.nv.us; Aaron.Ford@sen.state.nv.us; Nicole.Cannizzaro@sen.state.nv.us;
SenJUD@sen.state.nv.us (Only to submit letters/exhibits for Committee hearings.)
Senate Judiciary Committee
Tick Segerblom, Chair
Nicole Cannizzaro, Vice Chair
For your convenience, you can copy/paste the following into your email message:
tsegerblom@sen.state.nv.us; Michael.Roberson@sen.state.nv.us; Moises.Denis@sen.state.nv.us; Don.Gustavson@sen.state.nv.us; Becky.Harris@sen.state.nv.us; Aaron.Ford@sen.state.nv.us; Nicole.Cannizzaro@sen.state.nv.us;
SenJUD@sen.state.nv.us (Only to submit letters/exhibits for Committee hearings.)
Nevada Carry is not a lobbyist organization and does not claim to represent anyone.
No comments:
Post a Comment